The story of the British retreat from Kabul in 1942 is here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacre_of_Elphinstone's_Army
"Every day the government says that food prices are coming down," he
said. "Every day we are told that things are getting better thanks to
the cooperation of the Soviet Union. But it is not true. Do you realise
that the government cannot even control the roads? Fuck them. They only
hold on to the cities." The "mujahedin" infested Helmand province and
crossed and recrossed the Pakistani border, just as they do today. A
Soviet Mig fighter-bomber even crossed the frontier in early 1980 to
attack the guerrillas. The Pakistani government – and the United
States, of course – condemned this as a flagrant breach of Pakistan's
sovereignty. Well, tell that to the young Americans who control the
unmanned Predators so often crossing the border today to attack the
guerrillas.

Good golly how long will the Obama Administration keep a lid on ACORN's dubious activities?
Darnell Nash, a voter in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, has been indicted by a grand jury for, among other things, illegal voting.
Nash was registered to vote by ACORN.
Ryan Miday, spokesman for Cuyahoga County, Ohio Prosecutor Bill Mason, a Democrat, just spoke with me.
"After the election ACORN had to turn over all its voter registration cards and those amounted to about 70,000," Miday said. "The sheriff's office in Cuyahoga County has been going through mounds of paperwork."

The defenders of Obama and ACORN are fooling themselves. No one wants elections to be stolen by corrupt politicians.
ACORN's activities should frighten the heck out of all Americans, because their goals are the same as President Obama's.
Namely, President Obama and his surrogates are determined to turn America into "Cuba Lite" where a Castro and Hugo Chavez mentality supercedes that desires of American citizens.
In Washington State, ACORN agreed to court supervision and paid a $25,000 fine after five of its workers went to jail in July 2007 for sitting in a Seattle public library and filling out 1,800 registration forms with names they invented. In 2004, some Democratic precincts generated more mail-in ballots than there were mail voters.When Darnell Nash, whom ACORN registered to vote nine times, was convicted of vote fraud –not just mere voter registration fraud— in Cleveland earlier this year, Holder couldn’t be bothered to comment. A spokesman for Cleveland prosecutor Bill Mason, a Democrat, told me last month that a local investigation of ACORN remains wide open.
LAS VEGAS — The political advocacy group ACORN and a former supervisor were ordered Wednesday to stand trial on charges that they illegally paid canvassers to register Nevada voters during last year's presidential campaign.
Evidence heard during more than six hours of testimony left "a lot of issues that have to be answered" before trial, Las Vegas Justice of the Peace William Jansen said.
Mrs Snowy had other plans for Friday night, so being the grovelling loving husband that I am, I concurred.
I worked in a semi-government department in a former life. I remember one occasion where my boss and I had a meeting with an engineer from the local council regarding changing the electricity tariff of a pumping station that only pumped at night. He said that the council was going to have to pump during the day, and could we verify that the current electricity tariff would be advantageous, or should they change to another tariff. We did our sums and verified that the existing tariff would be the best, even though they would be pumping during the more expensive daylight hours. And so it proved. Until it rained and the council only needed to pump at night again. Because of the foibles of the tariff, this incurred a quite substantial penalty charge. And the resultant hullabaloo was something to observe.
All sorts of “experts” came out of the woodwork with an opinion on who was right in the matter, each arguing from the perspective that advantaged them. One councillor appeared on TV and confidently declared that the council had been assured at the meeting with us that the penalty charge would not apply. Which was a lie. I know because I was there, and the penalty charge was never discussed, because our understanding was that the daytime pumping was to be permanent. Fortunately for the engineer, he had long departed for greener pastures, otherwise I imagine he would have been hung out to dry by the councillors who had acquired such wisdom in hindsight.
So what does this have to do with the current climate change fuss, you may ask. Well everything. I learnt from this exercise that the only people who truly knew what had happened at that meeting were the people who were there. I learnt that those who had a vested interest in a matter weren’t very interested in the truth, but were more interested in cherry picking various snippets of the facts that suited their argument, and ignoring those facts that didn’t.
So it is that climate change denialists are having a marvellous time with the so called “Climategate”. Information from emails obtained illegally is being trotted out as “evidence” that climate change is not occurring. This, on the eve of crucial climate change talks in Copenhagen.
So where does this leave those of us who don’t have the knowledge to make an informed opinion on the matter? We have to get our truth from those whom we trust to give an unbiased opinion. For myself, I trust the people who use the scientific method to arrive at a conclusion. I have to be guided by them because I don’t have the scientific knowledge to make an informed decision from the data. What is being challenged on the basis of the hacked emails is that the scientific method has not been followed. This despite the fact that others have arrived at the same conclusion using different data.
I’m prepared to give the climate change believers the benefit of any doubt. The denialists are fond of saying that they want to be convinced that man made climate change is real. I’m saying that it is up to the denialists to prove that it isn’t real, using their own results arrived at by following the scientific method, and accepted by the majority of the scientific community.
Because if the denialists are wrong, we on planet Earth are toast. Literally. That’s not a gamble I want to take on my kid’s future.